Sustainability standards, reporting guidelines, and frameworks are comprehensive and established. There is now a great deal of guidance supporting companies in disclosing their E, S and G impacts, including the GRI, ESRS, TCFD, ISSB, SEC, and SASB. Considerable efforts have been made to standardise these requirements, yet each have different implications for materiality. To help, we have produced a guide to materiality requirements, summarising the key features and alignments between these reporting standards and initiatives.

DNV welcomes the new and updated sustainability requirements. It is now clearer how to account for environmental, social and governance issues against an organisation’s current and future activities. These developments have a high potential for impact, incorporating a greater realm of sustainability topics, and embedding sustainability risk assessment in companies’ internal controls, assessments, and management functions.

However, these standards are less defined when focusing on the materiality process. There is limited consistency across the standards reviewed in our guide, regarding the actual ‘steps’ and roadmap towards doing a materiality assessment. Our LinkedIn insights series will summarise some of the materiality gaps that remain.

If you’d like to understand how these developments affect your company, and how to get real value from your materiality approach, learning from our work with the likes of Nestle, Anglo American, Holcim, BP and Unilever, please do get in touch via this form with Jason Perks, Senior Strategy Director in the UK Sustainability team.