Looking for a specific product?

Make a search for products & suppliers, articles & news.

Identification of failures by Scandpower in complex subsea systems

The subsea industry is going longer, deeper and colder.

During the past decades, the equipment, system and interface complexity have rapidly increased. Conventional quantitative risk management methods may not be sufficient for identifying interlinked and/or human-caused failure sources in complex subsea systems.

Most accidents, such as Deepwater Horizon, occur due to a series of complex and interlinked failures, often caused by human decision-making. Hence, supplementing the risk assessment toolbox with specialised methods may be effective in identifying and mitigating possible hazards.

A Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) study is a multidisciplinary risk assessment workshop where a system is examined using a systematic approach. The system is divided into subsystems, i.e. nodes. For each node, possible failure scenarios and corresponding consequences are identified by the use of guidewords. It is one of a few forums where experts from all disciplines are gathered. This expertise is tried utilised through creative discussion; operational and dynamic aspects are also highlighted and focused on during the reviews.

Globally, the HAZOP tends to be a strict workshop setting where documentation of all more or less serious failures is in focus. However, this approach is considered to restrain creative discussion. The “Norwegian Approach”, on the other hand, has been found efficient in identifying failures in complex systems. Participants are encouraged to have creative discussions and to think outside the box. The quality of the discussion is in focus. Hence, failures that can be classified as trivialities are not discussed, but rather time is spent on identifying those failures often caused by complexity, interface or operational failures. Due to the high maintenance costs of subsea systems, availability requirements and the need for profitability, the most efficient risk assessment tools must be used. The creative HAZOP approach utilising available expertise in an innovative way and focusing on operational aspects should be an obvious part of this toolbox.

Related news

Latest news

Over 45,000 businesses risk EU energy fines for non-compliance

The previous compliance date of 5th December 2015,

“An Incredibly reliable net cleaning system”

Our predator nets are prone to fouling with scallops and mussels,

“An Incredibly reliable net cleaning system”

Good knowledge enables the customer to get the most out of the product. 

DNV GL initiates energy storage standard for Australia

DNV GL will lead the project and prepare a draft proposal for the standard,

Kvale acts for foreign ship owners in a direct action case

The case is against a Norwegian P&I underwriter and the alleged tortfeasor following a collision in the Singapore strait. Recently, the Supreme Court rendered a verdict on the issue of whether Norwegian courts hav...

Kvale recognized by IAM Patent 1000 2018

Kvale's IP-team receives great review from IAM Patent 1000 "The world's leading patent professionals 2018". 

Positive winds at the SeaWork International trade fair

- This is the place to be,

DNV GL and Brodosplit sign class contract for Quark polar expedition vessel

Quark has a long history of civilian polar exploration.

Elkem sustainability magazine 2017 and GRI report for 2017 is ready

Corporate social responsibility is one of the building...